Comparing EJB 3 with Spring and Hibernate

The limitations of EJB2 led to the development of the extremely popular Spring and Hibernate frameworks. These frameworks replaced the cumbersome EJB2 programming model with a nimble, non-invasive Plain Old Java Object (POJO) –based model. But, now, the EJB3 specification has embraced many of the ideas made popular by Spring and Hibernate including POJOs, transparent persistence and dependency injection.

So what’s the future of Spring and Hibernate? Are they obsolete? In this presentation, you will learn the answers to these and other questions. We describe how EJB 3 persistence compares to Hibernate and how EJB3 services such as transaction management and dependency injection compare with those provide by Spring. You will learn the benefits and drawbacks of each of these frameworks.

About Chris Richardson

Chris Richardson is a developer and architect. He is a Java Champion, a JavaOne rock star and the author of POJOs in Action, which describes how to build enterprise Java applications with frameworks such as Spring and Hibernate. Chris was also the founder of the original CloudFoundry.com, an early Java PaaS for Amazon EC2.

Today, he is a recognized thought leader in microservices and speaks regularly at international conferences. Chris is the creator of Microservices.io, a pattern language for microservices, and is the author of the book Microservices Patterns. He provides microservices consulting and training to organizations that are adopting the microservice architecture and is working on Eventuate, which is an open-source microservices collaboration platform.

More About Chris »